Five leadership lessons from the COO of Hyundai Brazil

Column

Strategy

Innovation

Leadership

July 31, 2024

Five leadership lessons from the COO of Hyundai Brazil

Within the series of videocasts produced by Pecege on leadership, the vice-president of Hyundai Motor Brasil, Marcos Oliveira, gave an interview in the studios of MBAs USP/Esalq. I compile here five lessons on leadership that were addressed in the interview, conceptualizing aspects related to quality, customer focus, employee focus, operational excellence, and innovation.

Dedication and commitment to deliveries

Continuous contact with customers, genuine listening, identifying pain points, needs, latent demands, specific problems they may be experiencing with products or services, can raise the bar for quality that a company needs to have, making everyone within the organization understand that some specific actions and initiatives can generate strengthening of the brand’s reputation. Examples: delivery of excellence; products with consistent quality; differentiated service; and genuine concern for customers.

Much more than just selling a product, companies will need to worry about delivery times and efficient technical assistance. These factors contribute to increasing the customer’s perception of value of a company, providing a feeling of support and security with the acquired products and services.

Understanding why the customer chooses one brand over another helps to increase operational excellence and makes everyone involved in an organization’s production chain work with a common purpose.

Firm leadership with a clear vision

The leader needs to have a clear vision of what is important for the organization and help their team work with commitment towards this vision, pointing out its impact on business strategy.

In the case of Hyundai Motor Brasil, Marcos Oliveira emphasizes that quality management is a purpose to be followed by everyone. In this sense, he constantly shows his team the importance of working correctly; of correcting and learning from mistakes so that they do not happen again; of acting with operational excellence; and of continuously studying work processes. To this end, leaders need to dialogue constantly with their teams, helping them to improve their methods and creating an environment of exchange.

There must be a lot of respect on the team, because it is through transparent and systematic conversations that people will understand that they do what they do not because someone is “ordering” them, but because it is actually important for the entire company’s production chain. Understanding the “why” generates commitment, not obedience.

An environment of honest and respectful exchanges fosters important learning, increases trust, reduces control, and makes people work with a clear vision of the future.

Humility to always learn

All of us are in continuous evolution and we can learn in various situations with diverse people. For this, we need to be humble and not think that we know everything or that we have already reached the top of our careers and our qualifications, regardless of the qualification or position held.

In any situation, it is essential that the professional says “I don’t know” when they really don’t know, in addition to “I will study,” “I will learn from those who know,” “I will get it right next time,” seeking continuous improvement. It is important to ask the right questions to obtain effective answers that help us make assertive decisions.

Furthermore, developing assertive and non-violent communication techniques, improving critical vision of processes, being questioning, having an analytical vision and creative and innovative thinking are factors that can catalyze self-efficacy, a competence that contributes to the individual’s ability to solve complex problems.

Companies today seek people who know how to solve complex problems and who enjoy continuous study, characteristics that are differentiators for any professional.

Lead by example

Quality management, that is, working with excellence in all processes, is an important value for Hyundai’s COO, as has already been mentioned here. To convey the relevance of this value to the teams, he has no doubt that the best way is through example.

Discourse and practice need to occur throughout the entire production chain of an organization. It is useless, for example, to announce that you sell a product or service of advanced quality, if the people who work in your organization have no idea what quality is, because they do not experience it in their work routines.

For example, if an organization’s employees take a chartered bus, is that transportation safe and comfortable for them? If employees have lunch within the company, is the food quality good? Are daily tests conducted and samples collected to verify food quality and food safety? In equipment maintenance, does the contracted team understand and implement quality standards? Do employees working on parts inspection know the importance of their work and what safety and excellence represent to customers?

Leading by example is the attitude that represents the image of discourse and practice walking hand in hand. The values, the strategies, the indicators, the recognition and feedback programs, the hiring; all processes within a company must experience this value. This is setting an example. It is worth noting that before the numerous decisions that Marcos Oliveira and his team of leaders have to make, they usually ask themselves if something will affect the well-being of employees and/or customers. If so, they take another direction. Thus, the leadership perpetuates, for its team of leaders, the notions about the importance of quality, safety, and the well-being of all people, strengthening organizational values.

Working on organizational ambidexterity

Organizational ambidexterity can be characterized as the balance between operational excellence and the pursuit of innovation. This is one of the great dilemmas for organizations: to have a careful look at current processes, as well as a look towards new businesses in an innovative way; to work on adaptability and alignment.

An example from the automotive sector: when a person decides to sell their car, it needs to be valued, and the automotive industries play a big role in this regard, as they need to constantly provide repair parts, component exchange, and maintenance teams that can serve customers: this is what we can call operational excellence.

On the other hand, in the scenario of rapid transformations, especially technological ones, like the current one, having a stock of parts for car maintenance and a specialized technical team are no longer sufficient. It will be fundamental to think about innovation systematically, following market trends, such as greater safety, quality, comfort, fuel economy, sustainability.

Companies need to form new partnerships and constantly communicate with their suppliers, as ambidexterity demands energy to keep the current client running and having access to maintenance or component replacement, while simultaneously thinking about new products that meet the needs of current and future clients – or even latent demands, maintaining focus on safety and quality. In summary, the five lessons above, related to excellence in deliveries, clear vision, humility, and innovation, show that the role of leadership within organizations is of extreme complexity and that, to be an effective leader, it is fundamental to have a good understanding of the business processes and strategies and to have genuine concern for employees and clients.

To access the references of this text click here

Who wrote this column

Denise de Moura

É consultora de Recursos Humanos com 27 anos de experiência; atuou em pequenas, médias e grandes empresas como Petrobras SA e Lojas Americanas. É professora convidada do MBA USP/Esalq desde 2013, doutora em administração; tem mestrado em sistemas de gestão e pós-graduação em gestão da qualidade total. Escreveu o livro “Cansei de Sofrer no Trabalho” (Qualitymark Editora, 2012) e idealizou o site www.dicasinfaliveis.com.br.

You may also like

October 22, 2026

Consumer Journey in the Decision to Purchase Infoproducts in the Digital Environment

The expansion of e-commerce and technological transformation have driven the need to understand consumer behavior regarding infoproducts, whose perceived experience has become crucial for professional development. The study aimed to analyze the factors that influenced the purchase decision of infoproducts in the digital environment, considering the stages of the consumer journey. An applied, quantitative, and descriptive research was conducted through a field survey with 100 consumers from Serra Gaúcha. Data collection occurred via a structured questionnaire, using non-probabilistic sampling. The results revealed a qualified audience with strong “mobile-first” behavior. It was found that the availability of detailed information and social approval were the main attraction triggers in the pre-purchase phase. In the transactional and subsequent stages, the minimization of operational friction, the agility of immediate access, and system security proved crucial for conversion and satisfaction, although gaps in human support efficiency were identified. Retention was based on the trust generated by positive past experiences, overcoming the price factor. It was concluded that the infoproduct consumer journey operates as an integrated system, requiring alignment between technological infrastructure, content curation, and support humanization to ensure engagement.

Keywords: E-commerce; Consumer behavior; Consumer experience; Loyalty; Virtual business.

October 22, 2026

Forecast of Aggregate Default in the Brazilian Financial System by Sarimax Model with Macroeconomic Variables

Aggregate non-payment in the Brazilian financial system is a crucial indicator of credit risk, the prediction of which is regulated by CMN Resolutions n.° 4.557/2017 and 4.966/2021 for the prospective measurement of expected losses. Aggregate non-payment was modeled and predicted using the SARIMAX model, projecting its trajectory until December 2026 under optimistic, base, and pessimistic scenarios. 164 monthly observations (July/2012 to February/2026) and macroeconomic variables such as unemployment, Selic, IPCA, IBC-Br, and household debt were used. The specification with contemporaneous variables was selected based on information criteria and coefficient stability, and residual diagnostics confirmed statistical adequacy, with a MAPE of 3.12%. Historical non-payment ranged between 4.33% and 7.64%. The estimation identified unemployment (β = 0.2534; p < 0.001) and Selic (β = 0.2128; p < 0.001) as the main positive determinants, with strong temporal persistence (AR(1) = 0.8965). Selic showed increasing correlation with non-payment (r = 0.62 at lag 12), while unemployment demonstrated a contemporaneous effect (r = 0.33). Projections indicated non-payment between 6.30% and 7.98% in December 2026, with a range of 1.68 percentage points, highlighting direct implications for provisioning in financial institutions.

Keywords: Unemployment; Predictive modeling; Monetary policy; Loss provisioning; Time series.

October 22, 2026

Combating Commercial Electric Energy Losses Using a Time Series Model

Commercial losses of electric energy represented one of the main challenges for distributors, directly impacting economic sustainability and supply quality. The efficiency of time series models, focusing on exponential smoothing techniques, was evaluated in forecasting billed consumption of consumer units, to support the identification of deviations associated with non-technical losses. Historical data of monthly consumption from an electric energy distributor in Brazil were used, segmented by behavior profiles (stationarity, trend, and seasonality). Simple exponential smoothing models, Holt, and Holt-Winters (additive and multiplicative) were applied, compared to a traditional moving average. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was the evaluation criterion. Additionally, the ETS approach was employed for automatic model selection and residual diagnostic tests, such as Ljung-Box and autocorrelation function analysis. The results demonstrated that more robust models showed a greater capacity for adaptation to the series’ characteristics and lower error, with a highlight on superior performance in scenarios with trend. For seasonal series, the ETS model showed a greater capacity for adaptation to transitions. It was concluded that the use of more structured time series models contributed significantly to the improvement of forecast accuracy and offered relevant analytical support for the identification of commercial losses and the optimization of operational and commercial processes in the electric sector.

Keywords: Energy distribution; MAPE; Optimization; Consumption forecasting; Exponential smoothing.