September 30, 2026
Use of digital tools in project management of new products in a B2B company
Use of Digital Tools in New Product Project Management in a B2B Company
Caroline Yukari Kubo; Sérgio Ricardo do Nascimento
DOI: 10.22167/2675-6528-202602766
Article derived from a Final Course Work (TCC), with content based on the student’s original work and adapted to the editorial format of the E&S Magazine with the support of the ResumeAI tool, an artificial intelligence solution developed by Instituto Pecege for textual synthesis and organization.
Abstract
The impact of using digital management tools on conducting new product development projects in a B2B company in the bar soap sector was analyzed. The research was conducted through a case study in the company’s Research and Development (R&D) area, over three months, with eight team members. A mixed methodological approach was employed, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Data collection involved daily observation of employee engagement in using the tools and the application of structured interviews, complemented by the Time Management Matrix, to assess ease of use and clarity in visualizing schedules. The results indicated that 62% of employees used digital tools, which significantly contributed to the improvement of activity organization, schedule tracking, and project management efficiency. It was found that the use of these tools favored a more planned and strategic approach to prioritizing daily demands, in contrast to the reactive behavior observed among those who did not use them. Cost stages were identified as the most complex for project completion. It was concluded that digital tools represent relevant strategic support for project management and for the improvement of innovation processes in the organizational context, highlighting the importance of their adequate selection and configuration.
Keywords: Schedules; New product development; Digital tools; Project management; Research and development.
1. Introduction
Currently, the use of digital management tools has intensified in the daily lives of companies. The constant increase in the launch of new products in stores and markets makes the business environment more competitive and challenging, especially in the Business to Business (B2B) segment, where a structured planning of new projects is essential to ensure process control and compliance with each client’s specifications. According to Sauser et al. (2009), projects represent a central activity for most organizations, being fundamental for achieving their strategic objectives. However, project failures are still recurrent and can occur in both their technical dimension, related to operational and technological aspects, and in their managerial dimension, associated with the planning, coordination, and control of activities.
In this context, the fundamental commitment of projects developed by companies in this segment is to deliver results that meet the specific needs or solve client problems. Project management tools have been constantly improved and incorporated into daily organizational life, as they allow control over variables such as time, cost, risks, and quality, which are essential factors for achieving objectives. As highlighted by Archibald (2003), projects promote changes in the present situation, either through the creation of market-oriented innovations or the implementation of new internal processes and systems. It is, therefore, a continuous cycle of organizational transformation, in which new challenges generate new projects.
The successful development of new products depends on multiple factors, such as risk analysis, understanding consumer needs, and adequate brand positioning. However, these aspects, although essential, do not guarantee the success of the process in isolation. It is necessary for the organization to have an internal environment conducive to effective and efficient project management, ensuring compliance with schedules, risk mitigation, and control of planned costs. From this perspective, it becomes essential to develop the right products and/or develop them correctly, as emphasized by Cooper et al. (2000).
One of the biggest challenges faced by companies is to keep the organization and project management updated in the face of the demands and dynamics of organizational routine. The limitations of predictive project management methods in innovation contexts have become a recurring theme among professionals and researchers since the early 2000s (Dawson & Dawson, 1998; Williams, 1999). The search for more effective solutions has driven the emergence of alternative approaches, gathered under the concept of Agile Project Management (Amaral et al., 2011). In this context, digital tools begin to play a strategic role, by providing dynamic, intuitive, and easy-to-use resources in daily corporate life, with a focus on visual management and quick consultation of essential information for project monitoring and control.
Various recognized authors and institutes, such as the Project Management Institute (PMI, 2021), have proposed significant efforts to improve the performance of product development project management. New strategies, methodologies, and tools, such as Project Portfolio Management and MS Project, are continuously being employed with the objective of improving indicators such as cost, time, and quality. These innovations reflect the evolution of business management models and transform the way product scope management is conducted.
The company analyzed in this study is a Brazilian consumer goods company operating in the personal hygiene, cosmetics, and household cleaning segments, with a portfolio of over eight hundred products. In 2025, the company surpassed the 3,400 employee mark and had fifteen brands. Among its production units, the bar soap factory stands out, which was the focus of the analysis. In this context, the unit began to invest more systematically in project management as a strategy to improve processes, optimize resource utilization, and ensure quality and efficiency standards throughout all production stages.
The adoption of structured practices, especially through digital tools, has proven essential for planning, monitoring, and controlling critical variables such as time, cost, risk, and quality, integrating agile principles and providing greater visibility into project progress. Thus, the application of these solutions in the corporate environment allows for aligning customer demands, meeting strict deadlines, identifying improvement opportunities, and strengthening the company’s strategic positioning. Therefore, it becomes fundamental to analyze how the use of digital management tools impacts project execution and contributes to efficiency, organization, and innovation in the Research and Development environment. Consequently, the present study aims to analyze the impact of using digital management tools on the execution of new product development projects in a B2B company in the bar soap sector.
2. Material and Methods
The research adopted an applied approach, focused on analyzing the use of digital tools in the management of new product development projects. This methodological choice was justified by the need to directly evaluate the impact of these tools in the organizational environment, with special attention to the routine of the Research and Development (R&D) team. The study focused on analyzing the effects on processes and operational efficiency, seeking to understand the support offered to decision-making.
The methodological design followed a mixed approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, as advocated by Creswell (2014) and Tashakkori & Teddlie (2003). The qualitative dimension allowed for the interpretive analysis of collaborators’ perceptions regarding the use of digital tools in project management. Complementarily, the quantitative dimension enabled the measurement of observable indicators, such as deadlines, productivity, and schedule adherence.
The research method employed was the case study, conducted in a B2B company in the bar soap production sector. This method was selected for its suitability in understanding contemporary phenomena in their real context, especially when the boundaries between the phenomenon and the environment are not clearly defined, as indicated by Yin (2015). The research involved eight members of the Research and Development (R&D) team of the aforementioned company.
The study participants were professionals from the analyst, supervisor, and manager levels, covering both sexes and aged between 20 and 45 years. Data collection was conducted over a three-month period, focusing on the R&D team’s routine. The selection of these participants aimed to obtain a comprehensive perspective on the use of digital tools in managing new product development projects.
Data collection was structured in two complementary stages. In the first stage, a systematic evaluation and classification was carried out through daily observation. The behaviors and engagement level of the R&D team members in using digital project management tools were observed, recording their interactions and how they were used in daily work.
In the second stage, a structured interview was applied with the same eight participants. The objective of this interview was the application of the Time Management Matrix, an instrument that allowed the evaluation of the ease of use of digital tools. Additionally, we sought to verify the clarity in the visualization of schedules and the agility in obtaining information related to projects through these tools.
For the analysis of the collected information, content analysis was employed, as proposed by Bardin (2011), for the treatment of the qualitative data obtained from the interviews. For the quantitative data, from the Time Management Matrix, descriptive analysis was used. This methodological combination allowed for an integrated understanding of the impact of digital tools on the management of new products, providing subsidies for the study of R&D processes in the company.
3. Results and Discussion
The analysis of data collected in the Research and Development (R&D) area of the B2B company, through structured interviews with eight team members, revealed important insights into the impact of digital tools on the management of new product development projects. The participants, who included professionals at the analyst, supervisor, and manager levels, aged between 20 and 45 years and of both sexes, provided a comprehensive view on the use and perception of these tools in daily work. Initial results indicated a clear division in team behavior regarding the adoption of these technologies, establishing the basis for a more in-depth investigation into their implications for project efficiency and organization.
It was found that a significant portion of collaborators, corresponding to 62% of the R&D team, used digital tools as essential support for their daily project management activities. These professionals reported that the adoption of these technologies contributed expressively to improving the management of daily demands, facilitating task visualization and rigorous monitoring of project schedules. This finding underscores the relevance of these tools as catalysts for effective performance, promoting greater organization and clarity in new product development processes. The integration of information and continuous progress monitoring, as pointed out by Kerzner (2017), are fundamental aspects that these tools provide, positively impacting organizational results.
In contrast, the remaining 38% of collaborators did not regularly use digital tools for managing their projects. The most frequently cited challenges by this group were related to a lack of familiarity with the available digital programs, as well as the absence of clear standardization of the systems adopted by the company. The perceived complexity of the tools was also a limiting factor, suggesting that the effectiveness of implementing such technologies depends not only on their availability but also on a robust training and support strategy. The lack of standardization and difficulty of use can compromise the efficiency of processes and the expected results, as highlighted by the Project Management Institute (PMI, 2021), which emphasizes the importance of user training for the success of project management.
To deepen the understanding of the impact of adopting digital tools on the organization of daily demands, a comparative analysis was performed based on the Eisenhower Time Management Matrix. This matrix, widely recognized in management literature, categorizes activities into four distinct quadrants, considering their importance and urgency (Covey, 2015). The first quadrant covers urgent and important tasks, which require immediate attention. The second focuses on important, but not urgent, activities, considered strategic for the long term. The third includes urgent, but not important, tasks, which often generate interruptions. Finally, the fourth quadrant encompasses non-urgent and unimportant activities, associated with time waste (Covey et al., 2017).
The application of the Eisenhower Matrix to collaborators who did not use digital project management tools revealed a predominantly reactive pattern of action. It was observed that the majority of their daily demands were classified as important and urgent, totaling 22 activities in this quadrant. Furthermore, 15 activities were identified as important but not urgent, and 3 as urgent but not important, while no activities fell into the not urgent and not important category. This distribution suggests that these professionals tend to concentrate their efforts on crises and imminent deadlines, which may indicate a low visibility of future demands and overall project timelines, hindering proactive planning and the definition of strategic priorities.
This reactive behavior, evidenced by the concentration of activities in the urgency quadrants, can be attributed to the absence of effective digital mechanisms for planning and time management. The lack of an integrated system to visualize and manage tasks leads professionals to prioritize what is immediate, to the detriment of strategic and preventive actions, which are crucial for the long-term success of projects (Covey, 2015). Such a scenario contributes to less efficient management of activities, resulting in a cycle of responding to emergencies rather than planned and controlled execution, which corroborates the need for tools that offer a holistic and proactive view of demands.
In contrast, the analysis of the Eisenhower Matrix for collaborators who used digital project management tools demonstrated a significantly more planned and strategic approach to work organization. The majority of their activities, 27 in total, were concentrated in the quadrant of important but not urgent tasks. This pattern indicates a superior capacity for planning and prioritizing actions that contribute to long-term development and problem prevention, rather than merely reacting to them. Only 4 activities were classified as urgent and important, 5 as urgent and not important, and 3 as not urgent and not important, reflecting a more balanced time management.
The predominance of activities in the important but not urgent quadrant among digital tool users suggests greater managerial maturity and enhanced strategic capability. As Chiavenato (2014) highlights, the concentration of activities in the urgency quadrants can signal planning failures or the absence of tools to support task organization. On the other hand, a greater focus on the second quadrant, as observed in this study, reflects more effective management, where planning and problem prevention are prioritized. This demonstrates that digital tools empower professionals to adopt a proactive stance, optimizing the allocation of resources and time for activities of higher strategic value.
To identify the main barriers in project completion, respondents were asked about the stages that presented the greatest complexity. The results indicated that the stage related to costs was the most frequently mentioned as a source of difficulty, followed by the stages of time and, finally, documentation. This hierarchy of challenges is particularly relevant in the context of a B2B company, where the approval of any new product development project requires prior and rigorous cost validation with the client. The need for detailed financial alignment with business partners adds a layer of complexity that can significantly delay project progress.
Complexity in cost management can also be intrinsically linked to the digital tools themselves. Not all project management software offers specific and robust modules for detailed financial tracking and control. More complete tools, capable of monitoring costs in real-time and providing in-depth analysis, generally imply a high acquisition cost and demand considerable training time for the team (ProjectManager.com, 2025). These combined factors can directly impact the efficiency of financial planning and control of project activities, making the cost stage a significant bottleneck, even with the adoption of other digital functionalities.
Regarding the time and documentation stages, it was observed that, although they also present challenges, their characteristics are distinct from financial difficulties. These activities are strongly associated with the operational execution and productive dynamics of the factory, involving factors such as resource availability, production line operational conditions, equipment production capacity, and overall team performance. Although digital project management tools can offer valuable support for monitoring these activities, the successful completion of actions in these phases largely depends on operational and human aspects that transcend software functionalities.
Despite the limitations inherent in operational and human factors, activities related to time and documentation can be significantly benefited by the use of an effective project manager. The digital tool assumes a crucial role by enabling detailed planning of activities, clear definition of deadlines, continuous progress monitoring, and systematic recording of actions taken. This allows for necessary adjustments, adaptations, and improvements during execution to be promptly incorporated into the schedule, ensuring structured monitoring and greater integration among the different areas involved. Such monitoring contributes to increasing transparency, traceability, and accountability throughout the project, facilitating the identification of deviations and the adoption of corrective measures in a timely manner.
In summary, the results of this research show that the adoption of digital project management tools has a significant impact on the monitoring and execution of activities in the B2B company’s corporate environment. It was observed that, while the cost stage demands special attention due to the complexity of validation and tracking, other phases, such as testing, production, and adjustments, benefit considerably from the visibility, integration, and centralization of information provided by the software. The findings indicate that the appropriate selection and configuration of these tools directly influence team efficiency, task prioritization, and deadline adherence, reinforcing the need for investments in training and in solutions that meet the specific demands of each stage of the project lifecycle (Kerzner, 2017; ProjectManager.com, 2025).
4. Conclusion
This study analyzed the impact of using digital management tools on conducting new product development projects in a B2B company in the bar soap sector. It was found that the adoption of these tools by 62% of employees contributed significantly to the improvement of activity organization, schedule tracking, and project management efficiency. The analysis of the Eisenhower Time Management Matrix revealed that users demonstrated a more planned and strategic approach to prioritizing demands, focusing efforts on important but not urgent tasks. In contrast, professionals who did not use digital tools showed a predominantly reactive pattern of action, focusing on urgent and important activities, which was associated with a lack of familiarity and absence of system standardization. Additionally, it was identified that the cost stage represented the greatest complexity for project completion, given the requirement for rigorous validation with the client in the B2B environment.
In summary, digital project management tools have proven to be a relevant strategic support for conducting new product development projects and for improving innovation processes within the organizational context. The study’s main contribution lies in highlighting how the adoption of these technologies empowers teams to adopt a more proactive and strategic stance in time management and task prioritization. However, the study acknowledges that the complexity of the cost stage, intrinsic to the B2B model and the need for client validation, remains a challenge, often not fully addressed by the functionalities of available tools, which may have high acquisition costs and require training. Furthermore, operational and human factors proved crucial for the success of the time and documentation stages, transcending software support. For future studies, it is recommended to deepen the analysis on the ideal choice and configuration of these tools, as well as the importance of investments in continuous training to optimize their use and meet the specific demands of each project lifecycle phase.
Bibliographic References
Amaral, D.C.; Conforto, E.C.; Benassi, J.L.G.; Araujo, C. 2011. Gerenciamento ágil de projetos: aplicação em produtos inovadores. Saraiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Archibald, R.D. 2003. Managing high-technology programs and projects. 3. ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, EUA.
Bardin, L. 2011. Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Chiavenato, I. 2014. Administração: teoria, processo e prática. 5. ed. Manole, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Cooper, R.G.; Edgett, S.J.; Kleinschmidt, E.J. 2000. New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research-Technology Management 43(2): 18-33.
Covey, S.R. 2015. Os 7 hábitos das pessoas altamente eficazes. 30. ed. BestSeller, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Covey, S.R.; Merrill, A.R.; Merrill, R.R. 2017. Primeiro o mais importante. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, EUA.
Dawson, R.; Dawson, C. 1998. Practical proposals for managing uncertainty and risk in project planning. International Journal of Project Management 16(5): 299-310.
Kerzner, H. 2017. Gestão de projetos: as melhores práticas. 4. ed. Bookman, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Project Management Institute [PMI]. 2021. Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos (guia PMBOK). 7. ed. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, EUA.
ProjectManager.com, 2025 [Referência completa não encontrada no documento original]
Sauser, B.J.; Reilly, R.R.; Shenhar, A.J. 2009. Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights a comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management 27: 665-679.
Tashakkori, A.; Teddlie, C. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, EUA.
Williams, T. 1999. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management 17(5): 269-273.
Yin, R.K. 2015. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. Bookman, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Article originating from the Final Course Work of the Specialization in Project Management of the MBA USP/Esalq
To learn more about the course, click here and access the MBX Academy platform