July 28, 2026
The role of commercial leadership in engaging sales teams
Denise Lopes; Michele Cristina Inocêncio
DOI: 10.22167/2675-6528-202600711
Article prepared by the ResumeAI tool, an artificial intelligence solution developed by the Pecege Institute focused on synthesis and writing.
Abstract
In a dynamic and results-oriented market, commercial leadership emerges as a central pillar for the performance and engagement of sales teams. This study investigated the direct influence of the leader’s role on the engagement and productivity of employees in high-pressure commercial environments. The main objective was to analyze the perceptions of sales professionals regarding the leadership practices adopted in their organizations and how these behaviors impact commitment to strategic goals. To this end, a descriptive and applied approach was adopted, using a field survey. Data collection occurred through the application of a structured questionnaire, composed of 24 Likert scale questions, focusing on leadership, organizational culture, and satisfaction, to 71 sales managers and directors from a technology sector company. The results revealed that leaders who adopted motivating and transparent postures managed to reduce resistance to change and increase the lead conversion rate. In contrast, the absence of clarity in goal definition was identified as the main factor for disengagement. It was concluded that investing in the development of behavioral competencies for managers is fundamental to creating more productive and resilient work environments, contributing to the sustainability of sales results.
Keywords: Behavioral competencies; Organizational culture; Sales management; Productivity.
1. Introduction
In a contemporary market characterized by its high dynamism and an intense pursuit of results, the performance and sustainability of sales teams assume a central role for organizational success. In this challenging scenario, commercial leadership transcends the mere management of people, emerging as a fundamental pillar that encompasses motivation, engagement, and strategic alignment of the team’s efforts.
The constant pressure for targets and the volatile nature of sales work intensify the importance of effective leadership. A sales leader is crucial for establishing a work environment that is not only motivating but also highly productive, directly impacting the team’s ability to achieve its goals and contribute to the organization’s overall results.
Organizational culture exerts a significant influence on the performance of leaders. Bastos and Cyrne (2017) highlight that an organization’s norms, values, and beliefs shape leaders’ behavior and how their decisions are perceived by employees. For leadership to generate a positive impact on team performance, its practices must be intrinsically aligned with organizational values.
Another relevant aspect of leadership in the context of sales teams is its ability to influence interpersonal relationships. Novato and Nunes (2019) highlight that effective leadership can create an environment of trust and cooperation. Although their study focused on the healthcare sector, their conclusions are highly applicable to the sales sector, where collaboration among team members and the level of motivation are directly correlated with the results achieved.
The relationship between leadership and team performance is also deepened by Silva and Mourão (2015). They demonstrate that leaders who adopt more participatory and collaborative styles manage to achieve better results in the training and development of their teams. This continuous improvement of skills is crucial for success in sales, reinforcing the need for leadership that promotes growth.
However, not all forms of leadership generate positive results. Abelha et al. (2020) analyze what they call the “dark side” of leadership, pointing out that poor leadership can create a toxic work environment. This environment is characterized by distrust, lack of communication, and discouragement, which can lead to a significant drop in the performance of sales teams and, consequently, harm organizational results.
Organizational culture also plays a fundamental role in defining the leadership style adopted by commercial managers. Carneiro and Streit (2021) demonstrate that an organization’s culture directly impacts knowledge management and process innovation, including leadership practices. A commercial leader’s ability to adapt and operate within this framework is essential for promoting a healthy and productive sales environment.
Given this multifaceted scenario, the relevance of this study lies in the need to understand how business leaders can positively influence the engagement of their teams. It is fundamental to consider not only leadership dynamics but also the individual aspects of team members, organizational culture, and interpersonal relationships in the workplace. Thus, the question guiding this research is: in what way can business leadership impact the engagement and performance of sales teams in different organizational contexts, considering not only the influence of culture and interpersonal relationships?
Understanding this dynamic is essential for organizations seeking high performance in volatile markets, where engaged human capital is the greatest asset. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the role of commercial leadership in the engagement of sales teams, based on the perception of the commercial area.
2. Material and Methods
The present study adopted a descriptive and applied approach, seeking to characterize leadership practices and engagement in sales teams. To this end, a field survey, known as <i>survey</i>, was used as the main technical procedure. This methodological choice was justified by its ability to measure perceptions, behaviors, and relationships between variables objectively and systematically, which enabled the acquisition of reliable and generalizable data, as recommended by Gil (2010).
The research was conducted in a large company, operating in the technology sector, focusing on its sales teams. The study participants were sales managers and directors of the aforementioned organization. The unit of analysis consisted of these professionals’ perception of the role of commercial leadership in engaging their teams.
Data collection was carried out using a structured questionnaire, composed of 24 closed-ended questions. Responses were collected using a five-point Likert scale, which allowed participants to express their degree of agreement or disagreement with the statements presented. This scale is widely used in social and organizational research to measure variables such as leadership style, team engagement level, and sales performance (Gil, 2010).
The questionnaire was developed based on references from the specialized literature in leadership and people management. Questions 7, 8, 13, 15, 16, and 17 were inspired by the works of Novato and Nunes (2019), which address the importance of communication, recognition, and a trusting environment for motivation. They were also based on Chiavenato (2014), who discusses management practices that favor engagement, and on Robbins and Judge (2013), who highlight effective communication and inclusion.
Additionally, question 9, as well as questions 21 and 22, were based on Silva and Mourão (2015), who relate leadership styles to the development of competencies and training outcomes. Dutra (2012) was also considered, who emphasizes competency management and the relevance of training programs. Questions 10 and 14 engaged with Abelha et al. (2020), who analyze the negative effects of poor leadership, and with Fleury (2002), who addresses cultural factors affecting team performance.
Question 11 was built from Chiavenato (2014) and Bastos and Cyrne (2017), highlighting the balance between results and human development. Question 12 was based on Robbins and Judge (2013) regarding inclusive leadership. Finally, questions 20, 23, and 24 were based on Carneiro and Streit (2021), who discuss the influence of culture on leadership autonomy, and on Chiavenato (2014) and Dutra (2012), who emphasize the relevance of clear goals to direct efforts and achieve results.
Before the final application, the questionnaire was validated through a pre-test with two participants from the commercial area. This procedure aimed to verify the clarity, response time, and adequacy of the questions. After the necessary adjustments, the instrument was applied to 71 participants, consisting of 8 directors and 63 commercial managers, in accordance with the prior alignment with the study objectives.
The responses were collected through the Google Forms platform, with the questionnaire sent via WhatsApp. This platform offered an accessible and secure interface for online collection, ensuring data confidentiality and integrity. The choice of Google Forms was due to its ease of use and its ability to automate the collection and organization of information, which facilitated subsequent analysis.
Regarding ethical procedures, all participants were informed about the research objectives and the use of their data exclusively for academic purposes. Anonymity and confidentiality of the collected information were guaranteed, with the signing of a Free and Informed Consent Term (TCLE). This term ensured voluntary participation and the right to withdraw at any time, without prejudice. Data collection was carried out in a way that respected participants’ privacy, and all personal information was protected.
The data analysis technique consisted of organizing and tabulating the responses obtained through the questionnaire. The data were analyzed to understand the impact of commercial leadership on sales team engagement, allowing the identification of patterns and trends in participants’ perceptions. This approach enabled the acquisition of relevant information for the practice of commercial team management.
3. Results and Discussion
The analysis of the collected data, through the structured questionnaire applied to commercial managers and directors, sought to understand the intersection between leadership practices and the engagement level of sales teams. The results obtained allowed for the identification of patterns and perceptions about the influence of management on the performance and commitment of employees in a high-pressure commercial environment. The following discussion synthesizes the main findings, organized into thematic axes that address the transition of leadership, organizational culture, the impact of training, the relationship with goals and performance, the profile of the respondents, and team management, always in alignment with the objective of analyzing the role of commercial leadership in the engagement of sales teams.
The Leadership Transition: From Control to Facilitation
As proposed in the introduction of this work, modern commercial leadership demands a paradigm shift, moving away from a purely controlling model to a more facilitative role. The results indicate that the perception of leadership as a support element is decisive for team productivity. It was observed that when the manager is perceived as a facilitator, that is, someone who removes operational barriers and promotes autonomy, there is a direct reflection on the team’s confidence in making decisions. This finding corroborates the literature cited by Bastos and Cyrne (2017), reinforcing that leadership is not a static position, but a dynamic process of influence that adapts to the needs of the environment and the collaborators.
Organizational Culture and Transparency in Communication
The responses regarding company culture revealed that employee engagement is intrinsically linked to transparency in management practices. The sharing of strategic information and clarity about the “why” behind the goals proved to be critical success factors for team motivation. It was noted that the absence of a bidirectional communication flow is one of the main friction points, generating what the theoretical framework describes as passive disengagement. Teams that understand the organization’s vision and the purpose behind the goals feel more connected to the results, validating the hypothesis that organizational culture significantly shapes sales behavior and commitment levels.
The Impact of Training on Performance and Retention
A relevant piece of data extracted from the research refers to the theme of Training, demonstrating that the offering of adequate training is not seen merely as a technical gain for employees, but as proof of investment in human capital. Professionals who perceive training as impactful on their performance tend to show greater satisfaction and less resistance to aggressive pre-sales and sales targets. The development of skills, therefore, emerges as an engagement tool that goes beyond financial compensation, contributing to talent retention and the construction of a more resilient and adaptable work environment to the constant market changes.
Performance, Goals, and Conversion Rate
When analyzing the relationship between Performance and Effectiveness, the results indicate that clarity in goal definition is the greatest predictor of effectiveness for sales teams. Ambiguity in the stipulation of indicators or the perception of unattainable goals act as immediate demotivators, negatively impacting engagement. The discussion of the data suggests that teams that maintain good lead conversion rates are led by managers who balance rigorous monitoring of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) with constant emotional and strategic support. This approach closes the cycle initially proposed, indicating that effective commercial leadership uses engagement as the driver for delivering sustainable results in a constantly transforming market.
Sociodemographic and professional profile of respondents
The analysis of the sociodemographic and professional profile of the respondents provided an essential overview of the investigated sample, composed of 71 sales managers and directors. Understanding the characteristics of these professionals is fundamental to contextualizing perceptions of leadership and engagement, allowing for a more robust interpretation of the results. The data collected covered aspects such as age group, biological sex, education level, current position, and tenure at the company, offering a basis for understanding the internal dynamics of the sales team and the influence of individual and collective factors.
The investigation into the age range of the 71 participants revealed that 30% were between 26 and 35 years old, 45% were in the 36 to 45 age range, 19% between 46 and 55 years old, and 6% were over 56 years old. The presence of younger professionals, even if in smaller proportion, suggests a generational transition in commercial teams. This scenario aligns with Fleury’s (2002) perspective, which addresses how structural changes can introduce new profiles and expand managerial practices. Age analysis is crucial for understanding the interaction between generations and the “facilitating leadership” model, allowing for the identification of variations in resistance to change or the pursuit of autonomy, and thus, adapting the leader’s approach to the needs of each phase of professional life.
The research also sought to identify the sex composition of the respondents, observing that 62% were male, 36% were female, and 2% identified in other categories. This distribution of men and women in management positions may reflect cultural characteristics of organizations and influence leadership approaches. Sex analysis allows for verification of nuances in engagement expectations or perception of leadership support among different genders, offering insight into equity and inclusion in the business environment and their potential implications for team management.
The participants’ educational level revealed that 48% had completed higher education. Additionally, 18% were pursuing postgraduate studies and 34% had already completed them, totaling 52% with some level of postgraduate education. This profile reinforces Dutra’s (2012) analysis on the growing appreciation of formal competencies and structured academic trajectories in managerial roles. In commercial environments, where strategic decisions require agility and grounding, higher education tends to strengthen the consistency of leadership practices.
The significant presence of professionals with postgraduate degrees, whether complete or incomplete, reveals a continuous movement of professional improvement among leadership. This finding aligns with Chiavenato’s (2014) reflections on the importance of continuing education for strengthening people management. Such a composition suggests that the researched organization attracts or develops leaders committed to technical and theoretical updating, which can favor more structured leadership practices aligned with the contemporary demands of the commercial sector, contributing to the adaptability and innovation of sales teams.
The investigation into the current position of the respondents showed that 89% held the position of manager and 11% acted as directors. This sample composition reinforces the operational and strategic nature of the positions analyzed. The predominance of managers indicates that the perceptions presented directly reflect the daily experience of commercial management, aligning with what Marras (2011) describes as the tactical role of these leaders, responsible for articulating goals, guiding teams, and ensuring the execution of sales processes. The presence of directors, although proportionally smaller, complements the understanding of the functioning of leadership structures within the organization, as Fleury (2002) points out regarding the different decision-making levels that make up an organization.
Regarding the participants’ tenure at the company, the data revealed that 6% had less than one year, 27% between one and three years, 33% between four and six years, and 34% more than six years. The concentration of participants with longer tenure, totaling 67% of the sample, indicates strong leadership retention. This scenario suggests an organizational environment that favors stability and continuity of managerial practices, which aligns with Carneiro and Streit’s (2021) reflections on the preservation of internal values over time.
Alongside this more experienced group, the presence of professionals with shorter periods of affiliation contributes to the balance between consolidated practices and renewed perspectives within the teams. This diversity in company tenure broadens the collective repertoire and fosters exchanges that can strengthen commercial leadership. Such dynamics align with Chiavenato’s (2014) discussion on improving people management and expanding the adaptive capacity of teams, promoting a more dynamic and responsive environment to market changes and the new demands of the technology sector.
Leadership and Team Management
In the thematic axis of Leadership and Team Management, the research delved into participants’ perception of leaders’ performance in crucial aspects for engagement and performance. The degree of support offered, the autonomy granted to collaborators, the frequency of recognition, and the effectiveness of communication were investigated. These elements are vital for understanding how leadership is exercised and perceived in the daily lives of sales teams, providing insights into practices that foster a productive and motivating work environment, according to the central objective of this study.
The research analyzed the perception of leadership effectiveness in daily operations, seeking to identify if managers act in removing operational and bureaucratic obstacles, allowing salespeople to focus their energies on conversion. The results indicated that 69% of respondents claim to perceive leadership effectiveness, with 42% partially agreeing and 27% fully agreeing. This predominance of positive responses converges with Robbins and Judge’s (2013) understanding of the impact of effective leadership on strengthening commitment and building trust relationships. However, 18% remained neutral and 13% disagreed, indicating that the perception is not entirely uniform and that distinct experiences may exist among teams, revealing opportunities for improvement in the consistency of managerial practices.
The research examined participants’ perception of how leadership practices influence team motivation, a central aspect in commercial environments marked by goals and high pressure. The distribution of responses showed that 85% of participants recognize that leadership practices directly influence team motivation, with 38% partially agreeing and 47% fully agreeing. This predominance suggests that the leader’s performance is perceived as a determinant for employee engagement, consistent with Novato and Nunes’ (2019) argument that relationships based on trust and cooperation strengthen engagement and sustain collective performance.
In the context of sales, this association tends to be even more expressive, as motivation and productivity become inseparable elements of commercial results. The 10% who remained neutral and the 5% who expressed some level of disagreement indicate, however, that the perception is not entirely uniform across all sectors. This interpretive diversity may reflect differences in leadership practices adopted by each manager, resulting in varied experiences among teams, approaching Chiavenato’s (2014) observations on how distinct managerial styles can generate different impacts on motivation and internal climate.
The research assessed whether participants perceive communication between leader and team as effective, recognizing that the quality of this communication is the basis for work coordination, goal setting, and strengthening internal trust. The data showed that 64% of participants perceive communication between leaders and teams as effective, considering the 40% who partially agree and the 24% who fully agree. This result indicates a functional communication flow in most units, aligned with Robbins and Judge’s (2013) understanding that clarity in information exchange favors cohesion and direction, especially in goal-oriented contexts such as sales teams.
On the other hand, the sum of 22% neutral responses and 14% disagreements suggests that communication does not occur with the same quality across all sectors. This variation may reflect individual differences among leaders or internal cultural particularities, an aspect discussed by Bastos and Cyrne (2017) who highlighted that organizational culture shapes communication practices and can either facilitate or limit more collaborative interactions. The perception of less effective communication in some segments points to the need for continuous improvement strategies, aiming for greater homogeneity and effectiveness in communicative interactions.
The research sought to understand if leadership is perceived as a promoter of the personal and professional development of team members, a fundamental element for environments that depend on continuous learning and skill improvement. The results indicate that 71% of participants perceive that leadership contributes to the personal and professional development of the team, considering the 44% who partially agree and the 28% who fully agree. This predominance of positive evaluations suggests a leadership oriented towards support and skill strengthening, a perspective consistent with Silva and Mourão (2015), who demonstrate how participatory styles enhance learning and favor the consolidation of skills essential for commercial performance.
However, the set formed by 19% of neutral responses and 9% of disagreements indicates that this perception is not homogeneous among all collaborators. This variation may reflect differences in the performance of each manager or in the way development processes are conducted in different areas. This interpretation aligns with Dutra (2012), who states that competency-based management depends on continuous and balanced actions, as asymmetries in practices tend to generate fragmented experiences and unequal perception of growth opportunities, impacting collaborators’ desire to stay and engagement.
In summary, this study provided an in-depth understanding of the dynamics between commercial leadership and team engagement, demonstrating that sales success transcends the mere monitoring of metrics. The findings revealed that leadership plays a crucial role, acting as a “tie-breaker”: while models focused exclusively on pressure may yield immediate results, it is leadership that adopts a facilitative stance that ensures the long-term sustainability and emotional well-being of the team. This perspective highlights the importance of a work environment that promotes trust and the continuous development of employees.
The data and theoretical analyses indicated that engagement is a direct reflection of established trust. When the leader acts to remove operational barriers and promotes transparent communication, not only is an improvement in the lead conversion rate observed, but also a strengthening of the employee’s bond with the organization’s purpose. The research confirmed that clarity in goal definition and investment in technical training are perceived by salespeople as forms of appreciation, acting as powerful fuels for motivation and commitment to strategic objectives.
Thus, the role of the commercial leader has evolved from a mere supervisor to a people strategist. For organizations aiming for high performance in volatile markets, engagement is not imposed, but cultivated through humanized management, constant support, and alignment of expectations. The results of this study reinforce the need for managers to reflect on their daily practice, recognizing that the greatest asset of a commercial area is, and always will be, engaged and motivated human capital, essential for organizational resilience and success.
4. Conclusion
This study sought to analyze the role of commercial leadership in the engagement of sales teams, based on the perception of professionals in the field. It was found that the transition from a purely controlling leadership model to a more facilitative role is determinant for the productivity and safety of the teams. It was observed that managers perceived as facilitators, who remove operational barriers and promote autonomy, directly impact the team’s decision-making capacity. It was identified that employee engagement is intrinsically linked to transparency in management practices and clarity about the purpose of goals, with the absence of bidirectional communication being a factor of disengagement. It was found that investment in training and skills development is perceived as valuing human capital, contributing to greater satisfaction, lower resistance to goals, and talent retention. Clarity in goal definition emerged as the main predictor of effectiveness, while ambiguity or the perception of unattainable goals act as demotivators.
The main contribution of this study lies in the in-depth understanding that sales success transcends the mere tracking of metrics, depending crucially on leadership that acts as a people strategist. It became evident that, although approaches focused solely on enforcement may yield immediate results, it is leadership that adopts a facilitating and humanized stance that ensures the long-term sustainability and emotional health of the team. Engagement, therefore, is not imposed, but cultivated through management that promotes trust, constant support, and alignment of expectations. The findings reinforce the need for organizations to invest in the development of behavioral competencies for their managers, recognizing that engaged and motivated human capital is the greatest asset for resilience and success in volatile markets.
Bibliographic References
Abelha, D., Cavazotte, F., Niemeyer, J., & Boas, O. 2020. O lado sombrio da força: A má liderança e suas consequências para os indivíduos e as organizações. Revista Economia & Gestão, 20(55), 38-57.
Bastos, P., & Cyrne, C. 2017. Como a cultura organizacional influencia na atuação dos líderes. Revista Destaques Acadêmicos, 9(1).
Carneiro, H., & Streit, R. 2021. O impacto da cultura organizacional na gestão do conhecimento para a inovação de processos em serviços. Atoz Novas Práticas Em Informação E Conhecimento, 10(2), 78.
Chiavenato, I. 2014. Gestão de pessoas: o novo papel dos recursos humanos nas organizações. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Dutra, J. S. 2012. Gestão de pessoas: modelo, processos, tendências e perspectivas. São Paulo: Atlas.
Fleury, M. T. L. 2002. As pessoas na organização. In: Fleury, M. T. L. (Org.) As pessoas na organização. São Paulo: Gente.
Gil, A. C. 2010. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (5ª ed.). Atlas.
Marras, J. P. 2011. Administração de recursos humanos: do operacional ao estratégico. São Paulo: Futura.
Novato, D., & Nunes, E. 2019. As relações interpessoais na enfermagem: Influência da liderança na motivação da equipe técnica. Revista Saúde – Ung-Ser, 13(1/2), 8.
Robbins, S. P.; Judge, T. A. 2013. Comportamento organizacional. 15. ed. São Paulo: Pearson.
Silva, N., & Mourão, L. 2015. A influência dos estilos de liderança sobre os resultados de treinamento. Estudos e Pesquisas Em Psicologia, 15(1), 260-283.
Article originating from the Final Course Work of the Specialization in Sales Management of the MBA USP/Esalq
To learn more about the course, click here and access the MBX Academy platform