Financial Management
Innovation
Technology
January 14, 2025
Digital assets and the future of finance
Technologies such as cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized finance (DeFi) systems are reconfiguring markets

Digital assets have been one of the most disruptive and relevant topics on the global stage. Technologies such as cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and decentralized finance systems (DeFi) are challenging economic paradigms, reconfiguring markets, and introducing regulatory and ethical issues. This has caused relevant discussions both in the financial market and in academia regarding this topic.
The existing literature on digital assets reflects the complexity of this phenomenon, addressing topics ranging from widely studied ones, such as volatility and pricing, to emerging issues, such as environmental impact and tokenization of traditional assets. Bibliometric analyses, such as the one conducted by Baskar et al. (2024), which served as the basis for this article, highlight not only the increase in the number of publications but also the evolution of research themes and institutional collaborations, demonstrating the maturity and growing importance of this field.
Since the launch of Bitcoin in 2009, the scientific literature related to digital assets has grown exponentially. The bibliometric analysis conducted in this study shows that the number of academic publications increased from less than 50 per year in 2010 to over 1,500 in 2024. This growth is associated with important milestones, such as the increase in Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), the popularization of Non-Fungible Tokens (Non-Fungible Tokens, NFTs) and the expansion of Decentralized Finance (Decentralized Finance, DeFi). These events not only boosted academic interest, but also encouraged international collaborations, opening up space for new topics and significant advances in the field.
Baskar et al. (2024) presented a comprehensive review of scientific production on digital assets, using a bibliometric approach to highlight trends, identify the most influential authors and institutions, and map gaps that still need to be filled. Furthermore, they discussed the challenges faced by the sector, such as regulation, accessibility, and security, and pointed out future directions for research and practical applications.
Just as advances in artificial intelligence are modifying various areas, digital assets have the potential to transform the global financial system, offering opportunities and challenges. This article aims not only to explain, but also to inform future practices and strategic decisions in the field of digital assets. To this end, it is essential to understand not only the advances achieved, but also the challenges and gaps that still need to be addressed.
Gaps in the literature
The advancement of research on digital assets has revisited a series of emerging themes that reflect the technological advances and the changes in the economic dynamics, social and environmental. Despite the progress, important gaps still limit a more comprehensive and practical understanding of the impact of these assets.
One of the main challenges is the sustainability and the environmental impact of blockchain technologies, especially those based on Proof-of-Work (PoW), like Bitcoin. PoW uses a competitive mechanism in which miners employ large amounts of computational power to solve complex mathematical problems, ensuring transaction validation and network security. This process is highly energy-intensive, resulting in high environmental costs. On the other hand, Proof-of-Stake (PoS) selects validators based on the amount of cryptocurrency they hold and are willing to “stake” as collateral, eliminating the need for energy competition and drastically reducing energy consumption. For example, according to recent data, Bitcoin consumes approximately 204.5 TWh of energy per year, equivalent to Thailand’s energy consumption, while Ethereum, which migrated to the PoS mechanism, reduced its energy consumption by over 99%, illustrating the potential of less energy-intensive solutions (Ali et al., 2024; Lin, 2023).

Another important research focus is the regulation of digital assets. The accelerated development of these technologies often surpasses the regulatory capacity of governments, creating uncertainties for investors and hindering large-scale adoption. The collapse of the exchange FTX in 2022, due to unregulated practices, is a clear example of the risks of this regulatory gap, causing losses to thousands of investors. Issues regarding global harmonization remain particularly relevant in emerging economies. In countries like El Salvador, for example, the adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender has brought financial inclusion, but has also exposed significant risks due to the asset’s volatility and the absence of a robust regulatory infrastructure.
The adoption of digital assets in emerging economies is another area of focus. In regions with limited banking infrastructure, cryptocurrencies have been used as a store of value and a medium of payment, offering viable alternatives for financial inclusion. In Kenya, for example, platforms like BitPesa enable low-cost international transfers, benefiting small businesses and workers who rely on financial remittances. However, digital exclusion in rural areas still represents a significant obstacle. Similarly, in India, stablecoins have been used to offer secure and accessible payment alternatives in rural areas. Despite these initiatives, broader analyses of the social and economic impacts of this adoption remain scarce.
Furthermore, the security of blockchain networks is a critical topic. Despite advancements, attacks on smart contracts, fraud in exchanges, and other vulnerabilities continue to pose significant risks, especially for individual investors. The attack on Poly Network in 2021, which resulted in the theft of over US$600 million, highlighted the need for more rigorous code audits and more resilient networks. In parallel, exchanges like Binance have been implementing monitoring tools based on artificial intelligence to mitigate fraud, but small investors remain vulnerable to schemes such as phishing and rug pulls.
Finally, the limited interdisciplinarity within the field is a significant barrier. Most studies focus on economic or technological perspectives, neglecting integrations with areas such as law, ethics, and social sciences. The Venezuelan context offers an illustrative example. Faced with economic difficulties and the depreciation of the bolívar, marginalized communities in Venezuela have turned to cryptocurrencies, especially stablecoins like USDT, to preserve value and conduct transactions. However, significant challenges persist, such as digital exclusion in rural areas and the lack of digital literacy, which limit the broader adoption of these technologies (Mattos et al., 2020).
Additionally, studies such as “El nuevo dólar gris en Venezuela es digital” highlight how the growing dependence on digital assets in this context evidences the need for analyses that transcend purely economic dimensions. These challenges are amplified by cultural and infrastructural barriers, which hinder equitable access to technological innovations. Without an interdisciplinary approach, which considers social and cultural factors, cryptocurrencies run the risk of perpetuating existing inequalities, rather than mitigating them (El País, 2024).
Therefore, future analyses should explore the interactions between technology, society, and economy, promoting a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of digital assets in vulnerable contexts. This includes integrating areas such as social sciences and law, seeking solutions that address both the benefits and risks associated with the adoption of emerging financial technologies.
The identification of these emerging themes and gaps presents a unique opportunity for interdisciplinary collaborations that accelerate the development of innovative solutions. Future research should prioritize regulatory frameworks that balance innovation and safety, the development of sustainable technologies, and the exploration of how digital assets can promote social inclusion and economic inclusion. By addressing these issues, it will be possible to maximize the positive impact of digital assets and transform them into fundamental tools for sustainable global development.
Future
Digital assets are redefining the global financial system, promoting innovation, inclusion, and efficiency. From the emergence of Bitcoin to the popularization of NFTs and DeFi, these technologies have expanded the boundaries of finance and introduced new regulatory, environmental, and technological challenges. Despite this, advances in the field, such as tokenization, and the use of sustainable technologies highlight their transformative potential.
Challenges, such as high volatility, environmental impact, and lack of uniform regulation, still limit its large-scale adoption. Overcoming these barriers will require cross-sector collaboration, balanced regulatory frameworks, and investment in technologies that combine sustainability and security. Furthermore, integration with traditional financial systems and the promotion of digital inclusion are essential to expand its scalability and social impact.
With collaborative and innovative approaches, digital assets have the potential to build a more resilient and accessible financial system, transforming the global economy for future generations.
| To access the references of this text click here |
Who wrote this column
José Erasmo Silva








